This topic is a bit different from those taught in any software testing course. Today, we will be seeing as to what is the psychology of testing.
Tester and developer mindset:
The reviewing and testing of the softwares is unique in relation to the development and analysis of it. By this, we intend to state that on the off chance that we are building or creating applications we are working emphatically to take care of the issues amid the development phase and to make the product as per the client specifications. Nonetheless, while testing or reviewing a software, we are searching for the defects or failures. Therefore, developing the software requires an alternate mindset than that while testing the product.
The right balance between independent and self-testing :
The evaluation made on the thinking of the tester and the developer in the above section is simply to look at the two alternate points of view. It doesn’t imply that the tester can’t be the developer, or that the software developer can’t be the tester, in spite of the fact that they are separate roles to play. Actually, developers are the testers. They generally test their part which they developed. While testing their own particular code they find numerous issues so the software engineers, designers and the developers dependably test their own code before offering it to anybody. In any case we as a whole realize that it is hard to locate our own particular mistakes. Thus, coders, architects, business analyst rely on upon others to help test their work. This other individual may be some other developer from the same team or the Testing pros or professional testers. Offering applications to the testing pros or professional testers, permits an independent testing of the software.
Effective communication and feedback between the tester and developer:
We as a whole commit errors and we at times get irritated and annoyed or discouraged when somebody calls attention to them. It is human psychology. In this way, when as testers we execute a test which is a good test from our perspective since we found the defects and failures in the product. In any case, in the meantime we should be extremely cautious as how we respond or report the defects and failures to the developers. We are satisfied in light of the fact that we found an important bug, however, by what means will the requirement analyst, developers, designers, managers and customers respond ? That’s the question to be asked.
The ones who develop the software application may respond protectively and take this reported defect as an individual feedback.
The project manager might be irritated with everybody for holding up the venture.
The customer may lose trust in the product since he can see the defects.
Since testing can be viewed as an destructive process, we have to take extreme care while reporting the defects and failures as impartially and cordially as would be prudent.
The right balance between self-testing and independent testing needs to be achieved.
This right level of independence helps in keeping away from author bias and is frequently more viable at discovering failures and defects.
There are quite a few levels of independence in software testing which is enlisted here from the least level of independence to the topmost:
i. Testing by the individuals who developed the product.
ii. Testing by someone else inside the same team, e.g. another developer.
iii. Testing by the individual from some other team, for example, an autonomous testing team.
iv. Testing by an individual from another organization or company, e.g. outsourced testing or accreditation by an outer body.
So, this was all about the testing psyche…
For a successful career in software testing, you can opt for a software course in testing, conducted by a
well known software institute in Pune.